2007 NFL Draft - 5 Things I Know
I have almost finished my last mock draft of the year. I felt that my first one was pretty solid, but trades and signings since then have forced me to make a few minor changes. Unfortunately, things never seem to go as planned in the draft. Teams at the top of the draft are either looking to move down (which they will never fully advertise) or bringing in top choices for workouts and interviews (even though they only have interest in about half of the people they bring in). Teams at the bottom of the draft are either looking to trade up (which they can mention, but without saying how high they want to move) or trying to calculate who will be available when they pick (which I don’t know how you do when you have no idea who anyone else is going to pick thanks to all the smoke screens).
Did you follow all that? If you did, can you explain it to me? The bottom line is that teams rarely do what is expected of them beyond the first 3-6 picks. After that, we always see “reaches” and trades.
That is how it always happens. A team picking 7th might realize, based on the players picked 1-6, that the player they really want will still be available at the 10 spot. They will then trade down three spots and still take the guy all those “experts” were saying would be drafted 7th. Of course, then those same experts will tell you they had it right because they got the player and team matched, just at the wrong number. What they won't tell you is that most of the time they are just guessing in the dark.
There are few sure things when it comes to the NFL draft. The easiest pick in every mock draft last year was Reggie Bush first to the Texans, right? We all know how that turned out. You can always bet that Al Davis has no idea what he is doing. You can also bet that, somehow or someway, Andy Reid will find a way to draft a few more fat linemen (that was for you, Jason). Beyond these sure things, it’s usually a wash.
That said, I’m going to take a shot at it anyhow. I’m a brave soul and I believe there are a few things I “know” about this year’s draft...
1. "Consensus" picks rarely pan out: The two seemingly consensus picks in this year’s draft are Greg Olsen to Carolina and Marshawn Lynch to Green Bay. At least one (and probably both) of these picks will not happen. Keep in mind that as I say this, I have both of these players going to these respective teams in my mock draft. Lynch could very easily go 12th to Buffalo, since they traded away McGahee. Then the Panthers would be able to take Patrick Willis (whom I have going to the Bills) from Ole Miss. This would then be an easy pick for the Panthers because they lost Chris Draft in free agency and Dan Morgan can't stay on the field. Picks outside the top 1-3 choices that everyone agrees on usually just don’t happen. If you don’t believe me, go check how many people had the Bills taking a DT with the 8th pick last year and how many had Buffalo taking a safety.
Did you follow all that? If you did, can you explain it to me? The bottom line is that teams rarely do what is expected of them beyond the first 3-6 picks. After that, we always see “reaches” and trades.
That is how it always happens. A team picking 7th might realize, based on the players picked 1-6, that the player they really want will still be available at the 10 spot. They will then trade down three spots and still take the guy all those “experts” were saying would be drafted 7th. Of course, then those same experts will tell you they had it right because they got the player and team matched, just at the wrong number. What they won't tell you is that most of the time they are just guessing in the dark.
There are few sure things when it comes to the NFL draft. The easiest pick in every mock draft last year was Reggie Bush first to the Texans, right? We all know how that turned out. You can always bet that Al Davis has no idea what he is doing. You can also bet that, somehow or someway, Andy Reid will find a way to draft a few more fat linemen (that was for you, Jason). Beyond these sure things, it’s usually a wash.
That said, I’m going to take a shot at it anyhow. I’m a brave soul and I believe there are a few things I “know” about this year’s draft...
1. "Consensus" picks rarely pan out: The two seemingly consensus picks in this year’s draft are Greg Olsen to Carolina and Marshawn Lynch to Green Bay. At least one (and probably both) of these picks will not happen. Keep in mind that as I say this, I have both of these players going to these respective teams in my mock draft. Lynch could very easily go 12th to Buffalo, since they traded away McGahee. Then the Panthers would be able to take Patrick Willis (whom I have going to the Bills) from Ole Miss. This would then be an easy pick for the Panthers because they lost Chris Draft in free agency and Dan Morgan can't stay on the field. Picks outside the top 1-3 choices that everyone agrees on usually just don’t happen. If you don’t believe me, go check how many people had the Bills taking a DT with the 8th pick last year and how many had Buffalo taking a safety.
2. Sometimes "reach" picks aren't that much of a reach: Speaking of the Bills safety, Donte Whitner was a supposed “bust” last year after being taking with that 8th overall pick. Now, no one is saying a word after he had one heck of a rookie year (105 tackles). Every year there is one top 10 pick that makes the experts sound like Scooby Doo. They scratch their heads, call the pick a reach, and then you never hear them talk about it again because they are usually wrong. Fact is that if these experts really knew this much about the NFL draft, they would be employed by an NFL team!
3. Joe Staley's stock will continue to rise: Joe Staley, a tackle from Central Michigan, will be taken much higher in the draft than anyone thinks. Staley has steadily risen up many draft boards, and for good reason. Still, most have him at the end of the first round. As fellow TalkingHead Pischl states in his mock draft, Staley certainly is becoming a “chic selection” - there are several teams early on in the draft that could easily take him. Don’t be surprised (assuming Levi Brown is off the board to Miami at #9) if teams like the Texans (10th), Panthers (14th), Packers (16th), Titans (19th), and Giants (20th) all give Staley a long, hard look.
4. Daniel Snyder will make a move: The Redskins will trade away more draft picks. I know, this will be tough considering they only have one pick in the first four rounds, but I have faith that Daniel Snyder will find a way. I don’t know how he does it; I guess he is just that good. With their one pick though, I fully expect them to look for some kind of pass rush from the defensive line. Whether that is a top DE (Adams or Anderson) to provide speed off the edge or a massive DT (Branch or Okoye) to demand double teams, the Redskins have to improve that d-line.
5. The Eagles will draft for the secondary: There is nothing wrong with the Eagles offense - the issues for the Birds are on the defensive side of the ball. They have problems along the d-line. There are questions about the linebackers. The secondary though, is certainly a position of great strength. That said, the Eagles will draft a player for the secondary in the first round. Don’t ask me why, your guess is as good as mine. But Andy Reid always drafts for two years down the road, and perhaps this is the year they find Brian Dawkins eventual replacement (Griffin?). Of course, this is all assuming some fat lineman doesn’t fall into his lap.
So there you have it. These five things will surely happen during this year’s NFL draft. Mark them down, circle them in red, and then e-mail me in a month when none of them actually happen.
So there you have it. These five things will surely happen during this year’s NFL draft. Mark them down, circle them in red, and then e-mail me in a month when none of them actually happen.
6 comments:
With all due respect to Kevin Curtis, I completely disagree with your take on the Eagles. I hate the age old adage that "we don't need receivers in our system". That's B.S. You don't think the team would have been better over the last couple of years if none of us knew who Freddie Mitchell, Todd Pinkston or Greg Lewis were? Regardless of how good your "scheme" is, great players make great teams. Until Reid realizes this, his teams will continue to fail in the playoffs. Not that I mind.
Where is the evidence that it was failure at the WR position that has lead to the end of the season for Birds over the past decade? Mitchell, Lewis and especially Pinkston were/are all decent recievers on an NFL level. Not stars, not real threats to any defense, but reliable atheletes with the ability to catch 70-80% of the balls thrown at them. I can't say an impact player at the WR spot would NOT help the Eagles, but it is far from a need. Next year they'll be lining up a more experienced Reggie Brown, a solid #3/average #2 Kevin Curtis, Hank Baskett who at least showed potential last season, Greg Lewis (see above adjectives) and have youth and speed on the bench in Bloom and Bethel Johnson. Not a superstar among them, but was Deion Branch a star before he won Super Bowl MVP? Anyway, you're not going pull an impact WR out of the bottom third of the first round and I feel the Eagles already have plenty of young prospects on the roster at WR...Brown, Baskett, Bloom.
As for Rick's ideas, if you stand by the thought that the draft is so unpredictible why do you, and a couple other writers on this site, insist on predicting it over and over and over? I am a rabid NFL fan, but having some hacks guess at who gets drafted where is of very little interest to me. Come the end of the month we will know where everyone went and that will leave about 3 months to digest what impact that may have on the coming season. Give it up!
Kevin Curtis, Hank Baskett AND "a more experienced Reggie Brown"! Wow! That's a dynamic receiving squad.
The Eagles have been absolutely terrible at drafting receivers under Reid. Mitchell was an unquestionable first round bust and Pinkston wasn't much better as a high second rounder. Brown might be a serviceable number 2, but he's not a go-to guy. The rest of the guys that you discuss (Jeremy Bloom??) aren't worth mentioning.
Say what you will about New England, but the Pats aren't afraid to go out and get a big free agent (Corey Dillon, Adalius Thomas) or draft for a WR when they need one (Chad Jackson). When the Eagles win three out of four Super Bowls, you can start making comparisons with the Patriots - otherwise it's kindof silly.
Regardless, my point isn't that the Eagles' wide receivers suck (although they do), it is that the attitude of the coaches and fans ("our system works - we don't need an impact wide receiver") is cocky, obnoxious and downright ignorant. If you have a chance to improve any position on your team - you do it. Look at the Colts, a team with a passing game that is pretty damn good. Who did they designate as a priority last year when it came time for a new contract? Reggie Wayne. Could Peyton Manning have gotten by throwing to Brandon Stokley or some other no name hack? Sure, but the Colts realized that having Wayne across the field from Harrison makes their team that much better. On the off chance that Peyton is having a bad day, the defense still has to respect the passing game because you never know when Harrison or Wayne will break a route wide open.
The Eagles will never win a Super Bowl under Andy Reid. Lack of impact receivers is one of the reasons.
"...cocky, obnoxious and downright ignorant..."?? First, your generalization that all Philly coaches and fans feel that the Eagles do not need an impact reciever screams of ignorance. Second, the offensive trend across the NFL is going toward position by committee, which is based on the feeling that superstars are overrated and not needed. I understand that you think all the WR on the Eagles suck, that's your opinion and I'm OK with that. However, not having to rely on one WR for 70%+ of your aerial attack doesn't exactly sound dumb to me. I'll agree that FredEx was a bust, but he was also servicable for the few years he hung around. I personally believe that Brown will be a quality reciever, what you call a solid #2, but in the Eagles' system that's the most they want. 3 #2 WR that they can line up week in and week out and between those 3, plus pass catching backs they've got a dangerous offensive attack. Odds are that no Eagles' WR will accumulate 1000 receiving yards anytime soon, but if three guys put up 700-800 yards I call that a success.
Also, chatising me for bringing up the Patriots, which I only did because Deion Branch went from nothing to Super Bowl MVP on a team with no star skill players, then comparing the Eagles passing game to the Colts is definitely the pot calling the kettle black. There aren't many teams that can afford to hold 2 #1 WRs on their squad and of course the Colts are going to succeed with that.
It's fine if you do not agree with the way the Eagles choose to set their roster, but just because it's not what you would do doesn't mean it can't work. When was the last time you coached an NFL team to a win, let alone 5 out of 6 Division Championships? I won't say the Eagles will win a Super Bowl under Reid, but I can't say they won't.
Scientist:
Despite your apparent distaste for pretty much all of our writing - I welcome your willingness to engage in continued football discourse. Were you to join some of us at the bar for Monday (or Sunday) night football - you would hear many of the same arguments taking place.
As for your response, you obviously buy into the "our mediocre receivers are good enough" line of thinking so I won't try to persuade you on that. I will revisit my Indianapolis point though...
Exactly why is it that Philly couldn't have two (or at least one) number 1 receivers? Do they not have the cap room? Isn't the local market going to hang around and support the team? Is Indy a better football town than Philly? Does Indy throw the ball that much more than Reid? I really don't think they do.
The trend toward "position by committee" that you spoke of doesn't really apply to receivers, as they are a committee by definition. Often, when a team does go to a position by committee it is because they don't have the quality of players to play every down anyways. Once a capable every down player emerges (Addai in Indy and apparently Benson in Chicago) the committee is disbanded. Regardless, if my team has a committee - I want it to be stocked with the best possible players out there.
Honestly Scientist, you seem to be a die-hard Eagles fan. I can't believe you don't expect more from your team.
I have no issue with most of the writing that appears on this site. Ocassionally you guys manage to post something that is actually interesting and has some potential to be entertaining - potential that is typically squandered. Most of your stuff is highly speculative and much of it not in line with my modes of thinking, but that's neither here nor there.
Your argument here continues to come back to the single fact that you don't like the Eagles' system and you refuse to recognize the successes that said system has produced. I know, I know they haven't won a Super Bowl, but who has over the past 5 years? Indy, Pitt, NE, NE and TB. How many of those years were the Eagles in the playoffs? 4. How many times did they play in the NFC championship game? 3 Plus they played in one of those 5 Super Bowls, albeit that one was with a superstar WR. The 3 straight NFC championship games pre-TO featured Thrash, Pinkston, Morey, McMullen, Milons and Mitchell to name a few.
I'm not saying their system is perfect and I don't agree with every decision they make, i.e. keeping Buckhalter every year, letting Stallworth leave, etc. However, I'm certainly not arrogant enough assume I can do better. My best option is to have faith in the Eagles' plan and keep cheering them on.
Post a Comment